I thought I might share my favorite killer bream bait...
Sorry about the photo quality. I forgot to bring my camera and so have to rely on the phone.
I got some nice tiger prawns today. Of course I am going to eat them. But there is more to a prawn than just the tail. The head, although it can be eaten, makes excellent bait...I prefer cooked prawns for this but green prawns are just as good.
Start by removing the head...we all know how to do that...I hope
Then holding the legs use a finger (a good finger if you have one) gently lift the head shell off...It comes off very easy.
You now have a prawn head with legs and no shell. You can eat it...I do !! Lightly crumbed and deep fry till the legs start turning white, about 30 to 60 seconds. Crunchy and delicious with a chili dipping sauce. Besides, almost half the weight of a prawn is it's head and you just paid close to $30 a kilo for it and most of the head is meat.
Now gently pull the legs off the head. Again, the legs can be eaten as is or deep fried. Fried is more crunchy and better.
Now that the shell and legs are off, you can see just how much perfectly good prawn meat you were about to throw away !! Although it can be eaten as is, there are some guts so you might prefer a quick rinse...personal choice.
If you want a larger bait, you are right to go. But for picky little bream I cut the meaty part of the head off. Yes, the meat gets eaten. In fact I will be using the head meat from these prawns for dinner tonight. A prawn omelet with green beans, Turkish pide bread and a home made habenero dipping sauce (yes, I like it hot).
So trim the meat off the head and you are left with this...an absolute killer bait for bream -
Here in New Zealand those prawns are also prime bait for rig shark and elephant fish.
I used them recently to catch a really nice rig.
People also use them as bait for stocked salmon in the Twizel canals.
I'm sure they'll also work really good on snapper and most other species.
Once I'm back in snapper territory I was planning to rig them up on my soft bait jig heads instead of soft baits and see how that'll work. I'm guessing it'll catch me a good feed.
Sometimes you get them really cheap in supermarkets, when they're close to expiry. Then I buy them and use the whole prawn as bait. Otherwise using only the heads and eating the rest is a fantastic option.
There was someone on the forum a few years ago (maybe a bit more than a few) that was using whole prawn on jig heads.
I remember now. A woman with a couple of boys. She was just starting to fish but her husband was not keen on fishing...or something like that. Anyway, she was told to use a sinker and she was a bit confused. She then posted some pics and it turned out she was using a jig head...Oh, I remember I said I was going to give it a try, but I never did...She was catching some really nice fish.
Don't worry about waiting for the specials...Do some number crunching, you will find that bait prawns cost 2 to 3 times the price of eating prawns !! And it is not just prawns. I paid $12.50 for 1 kilo of pilchard bait a few weeks ago (Lakes Entrance). Yesterday I saw in the local fish shop butterflied, ready to cook sardines (pilchard) $8.50 per kilo. Bait prawns are $8 to $14 for a 200 gram bag. Eating prawns, already cooked and seasoned and ready to eat are $20 to $30 per kilo (ie $4 to $6 per 200 grams)....AND you will get eating prawns even cheaper if they are not "size sorted". AND you will get green (as in not cooked) eating grade prawns even cheaper...AND eating prawns are fresher. If the prawns have been on the boat an extra day they are not fresh enough for humans to eat and so are declared "bait grade" and are then sold for 2 or 3 or even 4 times the price.
It’s actually illegal to use prawns bought from the supermarket as they aren’t native prawns which if you use them as bait they spread the white spot disease throughout the waterways. That’s why bait prawns are so expensive as they are native prawns.
In what Act does it state that ?
It is not illegal. There is no Law stating you cannot used cooked eating prawns for bait.
The price of bait prawns is not reflected in the fact that they are "native". The prawns I have pictured are Australian tiger prawns...Local, "native", Australian and cost $25.99 per kilo which is at least HALF the price of bait prawns.
It is illegal to use prawns bought from the supermarket in Queensland, I am unsure about other states. This law came into action in 2016. The link to the website is here, http://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/media-centre/media-releases/dept-action-white-spot-april
That is not a Law, it is not an Act...It is just a media release. I don't see anywhere in that media release that refers to using prawns for bait, but I did only have a quick read.
An Act (ie Law) looks like this - https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1994-037
It has Divisions, Parts, Sections etc, etc.
If it is illegal to use cooked eating prawns for bait, then it MUST be stated in an Act.
This message was in an article I read last year. I have seen similar reports on other fishing forums
Minister for Primary Industries, Niall Blair has warned people fishing, crabbing or trapping yabbies in any of the state's waterways not to use prawns intended for human consumption as bait because it could spread White Spot.
Not sure of current situation.
hmm, interesting I haven't heard about the white spot disease before.
But after some research it does seem to be an issue in Australia, particularly in Queensland.
Looks like there have been several outbreaks in prawn farms and people are not supposed to use prawns for human consumption as bait.
I couldn't find any reports or warnings of this disease being an issue in New Zealand or other countries.
Although it seems to originate from prawn farms in South East Asia.
It also looks like that cooking prawns for more then 4 minutes will deactivate this virus.
So cooked prawns could be safe to use?
A political issue maybe ? The issue is so full of holes if it went within 100 miles of a bath tub it would sink.
I am not sure if this link will work -
BICON regulations for importing cooked prawn. If the prawn farmers really do have an issue why are they not taking the Minister to task. The simplest explanation always tends to be correct. Are the farmers ignoring the fact that the Government the Minister and BICON are not doing their job...OR,,,Is the fact really that the farmers cannot compete with cheaper imports and so have invented a white spot scare campaign ?
It does seem strange, doesn't it. Seems to only be an issue in Australia and then only for a small handful of prawn farmers in Queensland.
It turns out that the regulations do not allow the importing of whole raw prawn.
But this topic is about using cooked prawn for bait.
Yes, you are correct, the cooking process (if done according to the Regs) removes or destroys all biological risks.
so it looks like the safest bet for Australian fishos would be to either pay premium for prawns labeled as bait or
use only cooked prawns and make sure they are cooked for at least 4-5 minutes to destroy the virus.
I've read that cooked prawns are just effective as raw prawns. So it wouldn't really affect the fishing.
Good to know those things. I'm sure nobody wants to spread any diseases if it can be prevented easily.
Perhaps the disease is more likely to spread in warm waters. Hence Queensland is mainly affected with prawns imported from South East Asia.
Putting the confusion and mis-information to bed...
There is no Law, Rule or Regulation preventing or restricting the use of cooked prawn for bait...anywhere in Australia !
Likewise, there is no legal restriction on using imported raw prawn either. However, it would not be a good idea.
The only restriction in place regarding white spot, is a Movement Restriction Area authorised by Law. A map of the Movement Restriction area is available on line as a PDF. - https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/1255637/white-spot-guide.pdf
There are no Rules, Regulations or Restrictions in place preventing the use of cooked or raw prawns as bait (whether imported or local) within the Movement Restriction Area...However, all bait (white spot risk bait) that is taken in to the MRA must remain in the area. That is, you CANNOT take the bait back home with you. Once the bait is in the area it must stay in the area.
Fines and other penalties apply if prawns, worms or yabbies are removed from the MRA.
There is no Rule, Regulation or Law preventing the use of eating grade prawns as bait...anywhere in Australia...and eating prawns are at least HALF the price of bait prawns !!
Points of reference...
Biosecurity Act 2015 Cth as amended 2017
Biosecurity Act 2014 (QLD) as amended 2017
Fisheries Act 1994 (QLD) as at current (2018 )
Fisheries Regulation 2008 (QLD) as at current (2018 )
Fisheries Management Act 1991 Cth
An argument ? Fair enough, I do sometimes come across as appearing to be augmentative. I apologise
It is not an argument. It is an adult discussion. If what you are saying is correct and it is illegal to use "supermarket" purchased prawns as bait in Queensland. Then that would have quite an impact on all anglers nation wide.
I believe that i have read most if not all relevant Law, and I cannot find any Rule, Regulation nor Act that prohibits the use of "supermarket" purchased prawns (ie eating grade) as bait.
You have stated twice that it is illegal to use "supermarket" purchased prawns as bait. All I have done is ask what Law makes it illegal. Or is it just something you heard? A friend told you? Local tackle store owner told you?
Yes, a cast net...Now that is something that is definitely covered by Law. Fisheries Regulations of 2008 is a good starting point...But Dept summaries can give enough info. Just remember no prawns, worms (marine worms) or yabbies or any white spot risk animals can leave the Movement Restriction Area...You can catch it in the area, you can take it in to the area...but you cannot take it out !!
Yes, I understand there are some grey areas. The Regs say white spot risk animals can be taken out if cooked, for example.
Unless you can name an Act or Law that makes it illegal, I would suggest that the solution is to use cooked, supermarket prawns. They are a lot cheaper and they are cooked so there is no bio threat.
LOL - I got a more philosophical/linguistical comment here. Sorry for being out of context
But when I think of the term "argument", I think in the lines of the definition in wikipedia:
In logic and philosophy, an argument is a series of statements typically used to persuade someone of something or to present reasons for accepting a conclusion. The general form of an argument in a natural language is that of premises (variously propositions, statements or sentences) in support of a claim: the conclusion (from wikipedia)
it would tick the boxes.
okay lets get back to the prawns...
that's a great solution Madmax0304 On top of that you get some extra fishing time.
just gotta make sure to not take them to another spot for fishing, as seemingly this could spread the disease.
Assuming they have the disease that is. But looks like prawns with white spot disease are easily identified as they'll have those white spots on them.
I wonder how easy it is to catch your own prawns though. I assume it's not that easy
Sorry about my last message. I meant it as more of a debate or a discussion rather than an argument.
Also it is quite hard to catch prawns in a cast net it is really all about luck, however the upside of using a cast net is you can catch mullet, herring and a lot of different bait fish that work just as well if not better than prawns.
I fish at the South Bank area in the Brisbane river, so to get back to the original topic of this discussion is that I find bread and raw chicken breast works extremely well to catch bream. Downstream this far small hard body lures also work extremely well.
As Mark has pointed out, the meaning of "argument" has dual meanings,
But he might just be throwing in a 'raw prawn' to liven things up...hahaha
I trust that you accept my apology for appearing to be argumentative. I can assure you that argument is not my intention, by any meaning.
I know it sounds confronting. But it's a simply a question, You say it is illegal and I ask under what Law is it illegal,
I like to think Fishing Reminder is very robust...family friendly as we have plenty of children readers,,,but robust.
I admit, this white spot issue is a vague memory. I sort of remember something about it from years and years ago. So now I am going off current data. I just can't find any info to support your claim that it is illegal.
You don't lose any face if a friend told you. Or if a local fisho told you,,,Did someone tell you it's illegal?
Yeah them little lures are great on bream. I have commented quite a few times on the Forum about lure fishing for bream.
I can not comment on the chicken breast but without being argumentative, I ask, is the chicken breast bait grade or eating grade??
Don't worry about going "off topic". Actually, next time I talk with Mark I will remind him of my suggestion of an "off topic" section. The ebb and flow of discussion is good.
no need to apologise. Once itsaboat get's into gear it's hard to slow him down again, LOL
Anyway good to stay on topic. I wonder if any of you guys have tried those gulp softbaits on bream.
I fish with them for snapper and they absolutely can't resist them. I swear by them, especially the green/orange lime tiger jerk shads. They might be a bit more expensive than prawns or other baits, but the good thing is you can re-use them and they don't go off.
And as far as I know snapper is part of the bream family so I'm guessing soft baits would work a treat on them when slowly bounced over the bottom.
In most parts of the Brisbane river it is a rocky bottom so soft plastics don’t work very well. However the canals on the Gold Coast are all sandy bottomed so I use Zman Soft plastics there. They are extremely good. I actually prefer Zman over Gulp as they are a lot stronger and work a lot better in Queensland (based on my experience).
that's interesting. I tried Z-man's and know a few guys in the kayak fishing community who love them and prefer them over gulp.
For some reason I never had the same success rate with them as I had with gulp.
Do you have preferred size/colour for your Z-mans? I've tried a few different ones. But the brownish/speckled ones worked best for me. Nowhere near as good as the gulp lime tigers though.
I have got a few soft plastics that I find work really well for flathead. I am unsure of the colour but they are the brown speckled ones you were talking about and they are Zman grubs. There are also good soft plastics of any shape depending on what you are going for in the motor oil colour. Motor oil Zman soft plastics are definitely the best soft plastics around. However they are a bit expensive as they are $11 for 6-8 grubs.
I'll give those motor oil z-mans a go next time I see them. Maybe I've just been using the wrong type so far.
But first I gotta try to put some prawns on a jig head and fish them on my soft bait gear
Also wanted to try the same with some salted squid.
A big welcome to Fishing Reminder
Your first post did mot go un-noticed.
I have a bandaged finger which makes typing sort of interesting....actually, if you could see half the typos this banage is causing you would wet yourself with laughter...Just to give an idea, Mark (prior to backspace) has been a bandaged jark,nark, hark,marj,kark...and that is just a feqw. Most of these bandaged caused typos would not get an R rating let alone a PG rating !! haha
Arr...It is OK. Just a scratch...and the pain killers work OK.
I was going to delete this topic. I only posted it on a pain killer induced whim. But it has caused an interesting discussion.
Oohh..3 fingers at once does not sound like fun.
That is an odd quote of Niall Blair. Maybe we should ask him to explain. His email is email@example.com Just remember you should never address a Minister by their name. So you start with Dear Minister and always end with Yours Sincerely.
According to the Australian Prawn Farmers Association 95% of prawn farms are in Queensland and 5% are in NSW...Blair is a NSW Minister.
All bait prawns are sold raw.
Pretty much all eating prawns are sold cooked. All raw eating prawns are checked and tested for white spot.
The only known white spot infected area is in QLD and that area is controlled by a Movement Restriction Area (MRA).
No prawns can come out of the MRA unless they are cooked.
Cooking kills the white spot virus and almost all eating prawns are cooked before being sold.
It is illegal to import whole raw prawn and all raw prawn that is legally imported is tested for white spot.
The chance of eating prawns spreading white spot is zero. Ever if a sick minded person wanted to deliberately spread the white spot virus they could not do it with eating prawns.
The only chance of spreading the white spot virus is with raw prawns such as bait grade or self caught prawns.
Bait prawns cost 2, 3 or even 4 times more than eating prawns.
End of facts and now for the assumptions...
The State Governments spend huge amounts of money on recreational fishing. That is a good thing. But of course, they expect to see a return on their investment. Victoria alone has just spent $40 million this year just on their 1 million fishers campaign. So, tax on $25 per kilo or tax on $50 per kilo ??
You cannot have it both ways, Blair. Eating prawns are either safe to remove from the MRA or they carry a risk of spreading white spot !! You cannot have it both ways, mate. What are you saying, Minister, is the 95% of prawns farmed in Qld a white spot risk? But they are safe to ship all over the country as long as they are only eaten ? Or is it the 5% from NSW that is the risk ?
I realise that getting a straight answer from a Minister is even more difficult than spreading white spot with a cooked prawn. So I keep it simple for you Blair...What information or data or facts do you rely on to support your claim that eating grade prawns can spread white spot ?
Yes, that is correct.
I posted a link above in another post to the import regulations. The last section of shell and the tail fans can be left on. But head, legs and most of the shell must be removed.
I work for a mob heavily involved in the testing for White Spot and have been reading this thread with some horror. Yes, you can legally fish with uncooked prawns. Yes, they are available from overseas and that is almost definitely where this disease got out into the Australian environment at these farms in the Logan River. The ponds where it was discovered were the outer ponds of the farm (the ones closest water inlets off the river).
Hi Cucchiaio, Welcome to Fishing Reminder
So you work for a "mob" that is "heavily involved"...OK..So, this "mob" is not solely involved and you are an employee.
I would assume that if you are an employee of significance of this "mob" that is "heavily" involved you would be fairly observant...Did you miss the point that this Topic is about COOKED prawns ??
In Thailand and others places (India Vietnam China - who secretly import to Vietnam to be rebadged to keep their production quotas looking good because Vietnamese stocks have big die offs... due to all manner of diseases)) the disease mitigation measures in ponds are nowhere near as sophisticated as here. The way the big supermarkets get around biosecurity law on importation is through further restrictions on their sale. If they sell them undressed then they have to be cooked (little Johnny pressed for time out the back of Coles might leave them on for 3 not 4 minutes). Otherwise raw sold prawns are 'for human consumption only' and 'marinated'. The problem is that the marinating does not kill 100% of the virus. As Australia's shellfish population (farmed or otherwise) are naïve to the virus it doesn't take much. Prawns from virus endemic countries are theoretically checked for disease on the way in from overseas but biosecurity are known to be underfunded and understaffed. It's as simple as making sure a few of the boxes up front of the checked containers are clean whilst the others are from ponds full of disease and they get through. As they are much cheaper than bait prawns per kilo of course people are going to use them to go fishing.
Really ? India, Vietnam, China et al, "secretly" import prawns to Vietnam....Hang on...Vietnam (and India and China et al) "secretly" IMPORT to VIETNAM...Maybe I missed something here...VIETNAM is importing "SECRETLY" to VIETNAM ????
OK, so the big supermarkets are getting around the rules....Yeah, nothing new...Have you reported them ? You do not need funding and staffing to expose the truth!
I smell a "conspiracy"...I love a good conspiracy theory...But the plot !! Where is the conspiracy plot...Oh, I see now...Vietnam is IMPORTING prawns from VIETNAM in order to HIDE the VIETNAM prawn stocks have "big die offs".
If this is all done so "secretly" how do you know about it ?? I have a feeling that if India and China et al combined want to do something "secretly" YOU will NOT know about it !!!!!
Or are you seriously asking us to believe that a toilet cleaner (employee) at some un-named bait prawn "mob" knows international "secrets" that are devastating the Australian prawn industry ???
Farming in Thailand and others places (India Vietnam China (who secretly import to Vietnam to be rebadged keep their production quotas looking good because Vietnamese stocks have big for offs due to all manner of diseases)) the disease mitigation measures in ponds are nowhere near as sophisticated as here. Brood (breeding) stock in Aus are individually checked against a bank of diseases because it's so important. The stud prawns are caught wild in the Gulf or elsewhere and shipped here alive. After testing (including genetics) they can sell for $100+ EACH!
Yeah...yeah...We get the "secret" bit It is an international "secret" conspiracy....India, Vietnam, China et al "secretly" import into VIETNAM !! We get it, OK
You are now starting to read (sound) a little confused. I hope you are not using drugs or something.
$100 + each ??? $100 PLUS EACH ???....O thinks me is heading NORTH....
Regardless, either unwittingly or through arguably wilful ignorance (as evidenced above by the "it's not illegal and I don't give a sh*t" talk above) they will be used for recreational fishing. It might be morally corrupt, worth hundreds of millions to the Australian economy every year as one of our few export goods, and have huge environmental impact, but hey, I save $10 a month and it's not ILLEGAL. If it wasn't illegal to go 100km/h next to a primary school would you still do it? In the USA it's not illegal to keep a loaded handgun under your pillow but how many parents whose kids have accidentally killed themselves think it's a good idea. Sometimes the laws lag or are just plain wrong. Common sense should prevail in such instance. It's in all our interest (even directly in this case - what do you think bream and flathead live off??). If our native prawns (and and crabs that live off them) are decimated by foreign disease then there'll be fewer fish for all of us. Everything is connected. Ha! You thought catching a few with genuine sold/bought bait prawns was expensive, wait until you try catching one fish every five outings (like in overfished popular spots anywhere).
As a Forum Moderator, it would be amiss of me not to chip you here. I know it is a minor word to use and we hear it on TV etc, etc. But, really "it's not illegal and I don't give a ****" . Mate, it just shows lack of intellect and lack of maturity. I am happy to engage in any level of discussion and argument...But if you do not keep it at a civil level then I will not engage you
Your posts are quite confusing. It is a real effort for me to make sense of your comments...Maybe you could express your concerns to your boss at the "mob" and maybe the "mob" boss could engage me ??
Sorry for the repetition and grammar/spelling mistakes in my posts yesterday. I was out fishing believe it or not and writing on my phone. Never the best strategy. I'm also not a semi-professional sit at home argumentative type with nothing better to do with my time.
Anyway, I can assure you that the source of this information was not a "toilet cleaner" employee of a a local bait shop. I realise your comment was just designed as an inflammatory remark but do you really think a LBS is testing their prawns or gives a... rats? They sell raw bait prawns (caught in Australia for the very reason of limiting the spread of disease). I agree that someone at that level would have no idea. Incidentally, if white spot gets into our native stocks in the wild where they're caught, which it very well could, then interstate sale of all raw bait prawns would be curtailed I'm sure, at least from affected areas. Tweed bait is less than 50 km from the Logan River where disease has flared again recently. But this is very likely a case of the cat is out of the bag, so I guess that is a bit of a moot point. I wonder how expensive and fresh bait prawns caught in WA are and whether our bream like the exotic tastes?
As to the conspiracy theory stuff. I must have confused things with my comments about Viet secretly importing Chinese prawns and on-selling to bolster their production/'export' numbers lest people find out about the health of their farmed national stocks (hint: it's not great). Hopefully with correction things are now clear enough. You're absolutely right that it is a conspiracy as I cannot quote anyone on this, suffice to say that the person who was in the room when it was being discussed probably should not have been there, and definitely should not have shared that subsequently (admittedly in a qualified manner off the record). I was, and am still, in two minds about posting it here. If only I had a 'mob' to back me up and wasn't employed by a company that explicitly advises against this sort of thing. Enough said. I have no proof to point to so take it as you will.
If you think corruption isn't rife in some of these countries then you've got your head stuck in the sand. It's quite well documented by investigated journalists far more adept at exposing the truth and communicating that truth than you or I. It's a pity that it always comes down to the dollar value of things, both on the supermarket and the consumer side (including fishermen). There is a difference between knowing that it goes on and proving it, let alone stopping it.
Finally, in regards to your comment about supermarket bought prawns used as bait posing zero risk of spreading White Spot and other predominantly viral diseases - I could not disagree more. Stick to your day job (I wonder what that is? Trolling users like on this forum/the internet?) and I'll stick to mine.
I like dealing with facts too (it goes with my profession), so here's a few:
1) Predominantly raw vannamei prawns from SE asia can and do harbour and spread all manner of diseases. They represent the most popular imported prawns sold here, are cheap and are small and 'hook sized'.
2) It is questionable whether marinating alone is enough to kill these, hence current research
3) The fact that White Spot appeared first in the farms at Jacob's Well is not that surprising considering the bulk of Australian farmed prawns are from there, close to lots of recreational fishers in the Logan River
4) Prawns (and other crustaceans such as crabs) are teh scavengers of the seas, eating pretty much anything that they come across; this gives them their amazing flavour and texture, but also partly explains their fragility and susceptibility to disease, especially in large numbers in farmed conditions. In Australia we have significant control measures at farms for this very reason, and yet, once it is out and perpetuated in the environment, the life-cycle through other marine detritivores means it will be almost impossible to stamp out.
5) Just because a prawn isn't covered in white spots or doesn't have a yellow head or visible muscle wastage doesn't mean it's not carrying viable pathogenic virus.
But hey, don't take my word for this stuff. Research it yourself. Here's a good start:
You're right though, even if diseased, raw prawns cooked for 4 minutes in salty BOILING water are largely safe. Anything less and results are variable. That is exactly what scientists are testing. All too late for the Aus prawn industry and White Spot in SEQ probably, but hey, you need a crisis for the government to fund some of this stuff and realise how serious it is.
Your bait preparation procedure, with that cooking step, is probably fine. Until those tests have been done and I've seen the results though, and there are no more outbreaks of whatever, then I will reserve my judgement on the use of imported prawns (implicitly sold for human consumption) as bait. Hopefully all who read this take note.
come on guys, what's the matter here?
There's no need for personal attacks on your jobs or intellectual capabilities.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
Be nice to each other and stick to the facts and topic at hand.
I know it's highly controversial but you wont achieve anything by trying to degrade each other.
We're all in the same boat and I would like my site to remain friendly and open to everyone.
Perhaps make it clear in the original post that we're talking about cooked prawns here, as everyone seems to agree that this will get rid of the virus and hence they are safe to use as bait.
Thanks for the reples Cucchiao,
News articles and media releases are not and can never be considered factual.
Here are some facts...
White spot is only known in Australia in one area. That area is controlled with a Movement Restriction Area (MRA).
According to the APFA prawn farming produces appox $88 million per year.
According to Australian Prawn Fisheries, the Australian prawn industry produces approx $272 million.
It is not clear if that $272 mil includes the $88 mil of farmed prawns or if it is only wild caught prawns.
About $94 million worth of Australian caught prawns are exported.
Even if every single angler in Australia refused to use bait prawns and ONLY used supermarket prawns as bait, it would be impossible to have an impact worth hundreds of millions !!
All bait prawns are sold raw...UNCOOKED !!
It is illegal to ship raw prawns out of the MRA...you can take them in but you cannot take them out.
Morton Bay is smack in the middle of the MRA !!
80%...80 PERCENT of all RAW bait prawns come from...you guessed it...Morton Bay !!
So, 80% of an entire sub-industry is restricted by the MRA !! Certainly millions affected but not 100's of millions.
So, 20% of that entire sub-industry has almost the entire country as it's market !!
You want to look at news, OK, take a look at the news about banks at the moment. You will see what people are like when it comes to money.
The facts speak volumes. Queenslanders have 80% of an entire sub-industry reasons, to argue that using eating grade prawns as bait is wrong.
Here is a simple solution...Cook the bait prawns !! Then instead of spreading false truths they could spread true truths about how good cooked prawns are for bait. Of course, cooked prawns CAN be shipped out of the MRA. For those anglers wanting to still use raw prawns can because 20% of the sub-industry is supplying them.
Back to the money...With or without it being combined $94 mil is exported. So somewhere around $200 mil is domestic use. Pick a number...Let's say 20% is imported, that would be about 40 mil...Do you really think that India and China are going to join forces to supply Vietnam just to get around our import regulations for the sake of 40 mil ?? Of course not. No country is going to risk international condemnation for the sake of 40 mil...they would not do it for the full amount of 200 mil.
Posted by Mark Totzke
LOL - you should be - it turned out into a rather interesting and sometimes hair raising thread.
Posted by Madmax0304
I am actually quite proud that I started this huge debate about the white spot disease from watching one ad on YouTube for it.
Madmax0304 1 week ago
It is illegal to use prawns bought from the supermarket in Queensland, I am unsure about other states. This law came into action in 2016. The link to the website is here,
OK...So if you researched about it, then it should be easy for you to throw some facts and figures at me !!
I have done some research too...Only because this topic has become quite a topic. And I think it should be a topic for discussion.
What I have found so far, sort of puts a grey cloud over Qld.
I am not a brick wall. I am not a stubborn person. I started by asking what Law. OK, so it turns out there is no such Law. But that has in turn raised more questions...
Only because this Topic persisted, is why I researched more...and that further research has lead me to farming. Unless you, or anyone, can throw some facts and figures at me to the contrary, I have to conclude that farming has caused the problem....But, no one knows...Yeah it could be that India and China have conspired with Vietnam to undermine the Australian prawn industry...But simple tends to be correct. Farming is known to cause disease...Prawn farms - then white spot appears - bla bla - simple - But no one actually knows !!
An "unsubscribe" button is a good idea. I am sure Mark will look in to it. It would be good to see your further input. I would like to see you stick around but it is your choice
I'm with you that intensive farming increases the chance of these diseases massively. That is the major shortfall of farmed aquaculture and particularly prawn aquaculture.
Did you watch that video in the last link I sent of the government review into this exact outbreak? There was a massive breach in quarantine with imported prawns before January 9 this year. Investigations have shown that 35-40% of imports shown to be negative for white spot were in fact false negatives and actually contained disease. Coupled with another 20 odd percent that showed positive in initial testing and it is quite clear that procedures did not cut the mustard. Those are the facts. There is contention about who is to blame (was it the test? was it the fact that Australian quarantine inspection agents were calling suppliers to pick out the random boxes from cold storage ahead of their visits? Tell me such a process isn't open to easy subversion through swapping with known virus free samples). Regardless, I actually age with you. Ockham's Razor: the simplest explanation is almost always correct.
If you accept that infected imported prawns could have slipped through quarantine and recreational fishermen near the affected farms may have used uncooked 'marinated' prawns for bait the it's not hard to imagine how this whole debacle most likely occurred.
As I acknowledged previously, there's a difference between knowing something is highly the truth and proving it. And yet that is actually what current ongoing research is trying to do. Believe it or not you can actually track where disease stains originate from through their DNA. Look up the current woes of the SA and Tasmanian abalone industry for another example.
In the end it doesn't really matter whether the bait (originally sold for human consumption) came from China India Vietnam or wherever. It's happened. Now it's limiting its spread that is important.
Yes, I was referring to Ockam's Razor...A scientific principle which states - all things being equal the simplest explanation tends to be correct.
Are all things equal?
I assume you refer to post #5974 above, in which I stated -
itsaboat 1 week ago
A political issue maybe ? The issue is so full of holes if it went within 100 miles of a bath tub it would sink.
It does seem strange, doesn't it. Seems to only be an issue in Australia and then only for a small handful of prawn farmers in Queensland.
I do find it slightly ironic that you as a skeptic point to some conspiratorial cabal of Queensland (wild-caught) bait prawn suppliers being in cahoots with government to screw the poor recreational fisherman (or woman) by putting out supposed propaganda about the risks of using supermarket prawns for anything but eating.
Sorry Max, I was replying on my phone again, hence the litany of mistakes. Not the best. I was also actually referring to itsaboat's conspiracy about the Queensland bait industry and the theory that they're putting out YouTube ads as a protectionist measure not for the sake of the Australian environment and a well-managed, healthy industry that has now been compromised through no fault of their own.
He purports that $40millions of dollars annually is no incentive for overseas suppliers to falsify test data and also that these foreign governments are not open to corruption and yet White Spot aside that's exactly what has been proven more than once over many years. I was never suggesting this was a deliberate attempt by foreign markets to undermine the disease-free Australian domestic suppliers. It's just a happy coincidence for them that this disease has escaped now and that they have largely escaped severe reprimand themselves.
If you want to talk about a better conspiracy theory then think about the prime real estate value of affected farms that are holding out on developers on the Logan River. It would take a kilo of easily domestically procured infected prawns (40%+ of Thailand imported prawns subsequently tested at the Australian Animal Health Laboratory in Geelong proved to have virus) dumped in those outer ponds and Bob's your uncle, farm stocks are decimated and the companies potentially go to the wall. Guess who's all to eager to buy the land upon liquidation?
All the frozen bait comes from a few smalll areas in Australia the majority of recreational fishos get their bait from a freezer at a servo. There have been outbreaks As far as WA via frozen bait procured and distributed from northern nsw and qld estuaries.
These estuaries were hit with an outbreak but wasn’t discovered before they had been distributed all over the country. Many had already been thrown into estuaries as bait. The qld gov is trying to prevent these cases as should all the other states. However the problem with it is that the prawns for humans come from all over the world. Unfortunately greed and profit margins corrupt many markets to label prawns origin as Australia when In fact they are from Vietnam for example. Also most people can not tell What kind of prawns they are buying when they are already cooked. The scary thing is that we could easily damage our local fishing spots by introducing foreign baits.
So being fisherman no matter what we think about laws and acts etc why not , in the name of fishing active source your own bait in the same area. You may spend a chunk of time procuring your bait only to. One up empty handed but that is fishing regardless
There have been outbreaks As far as WA
The qld gov is trying to prevent these cases
Unfortunately greed and profit margins corrupt many markets to label prawns origin as Australia when In fact they are from Vietnam for example