Topic thumbnail

Tilapia To Eat Or Not To Eat

Over the past week or so this story has been in the news. It is the first time I have heard about it. But I have found similar news stories going back to 2012. So the debate has been going on for some time.


The gist of it...Tilapia is a noxious pest in Queensland. Fair enough.


But in Queensland (and only in Queensland apparently) if you catch one you are not allowed to eat it.

The debate is the laws should be changed so that people can catch and eat tilapia. It would be almost impossible to Police anyway, but that's the law, you can't eat them.


Here is the thing that raised my eyebrows a bit...You can buy frozen tilapia in Queensland, but only if it is imported from overseas !!

Tilapia is a very popular eating fish around the world and in Australia. Apparently it is imported and available in all the main supermarkets.


But there are also local producers. However, the local producers cannot sell tilapia in Queensland. The Queensland rules are it must come from overseas. They don't care what country so long as it is not Australia...Even if the Australian producers meet or exceed the standards required


https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2024-11-18/pest-fish-tilapia-is-illegal-to-eat-in-queensland-if-wild-caught/104599070


Likes: 0 Login to reply 1 week ago

It’s weird for sure.


On one hand, I understand why tilapia is classified as a noxious pest in Queensland—they’ve had a huge impact on local ecosystems. But the part about not being able to eat what you catch does seem a bit counterintuitive. If people were allowed to catch and eat tilapia, it might actually help reduce their numbers in the wild.


The imported frozen tilapia situation is even more puzzling. It’s strange that supermarkets can sell imported tilapia, but local producers can’t sell their fish in Queensland, even if they meet or exceed all the required standards. That doesn’t seem to make much sense, especially when we could be supporting local producers instead of relying on imports.


It feels like there’s a bit of a disconnect here. If the goal is to control tilapia and protect the environment, wouldn’t it make more sense to encourage people to catch and consume them locally?


And what about carp, isn't that a very similar situation?

They have it in one of their "fact sheets" that even if processed in Australia in accordance with the regulations for import / export, they cannot be eaten in Qld...They must be imported from overseas.


Carp is a little different. I don't think tilapia were introduced as food. Where as carp were.


Carp is the most eaten fish in the world. In the early to mid 1800's carp was farmed in northern Victoria. 200 years ago they didn't know about how the Murray floods. The water for the farm came from the Murray River. It flooded and they lost the farms.


People from all over Australia flocked to Vic to get the carp and take them home. Until recently almost all councils even had instruction sheets on how to grow carp.


Interestingly, that is the reason they give for banning eating of tilapia...They say if people can eat them, then they will collect them. People will take them home and grow them in dams and creeks.


That is totally flawed and makes no sense. If people were going to put them in dams, they will regardless of the law. Plus it would take away the whole adventure of going fishing for them.


Redfin for example (English perch). A pest fish and excellent eating. No one is taking them home to put in dams. In fact it is a specilised target. Easy to catch. But if you want there are custom made rods and reels specifically for redfin. People spends $1,000's on lures and gear just to target redfin.


Tell people they can eat tilapia and the same thing will happen...People will target them and a whole little industry will be born.